iFANN
    iFANN'da ara...
    Giriş Yap
    Ana Sayfa
    Haberler
    Videolar
    Fotoğraflar
    GIF'ler
    Keşfet
    Anketler
    Ödüller
    iFAMOUS
    Viki
    Anime
    Odalar
    Bildirimler
    Mesajlar
    Yer İmleri
    Profil
    VikiÖdülleriFAMOUSSıralamalarSektörlerİçerik Üretici ÖdülleriKullanıcı ÖdülleriŞartlarGizlilikTopluluk KurallarıKaldırma / DMCAYardımGeliştiriciler

    © 2026 iFANN

    Ana Sayfa
    Ara
    Mesajlar
    Uyarılar
    Profil
    Fotoğraf
    Estebankiwi
    Estebankiwi@estebankiwi3mo
    📱GPT💭AI💭Tech
    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwiClaude Fable 5 has claimed the top spot on DeepSWE with a score of 70%. However, the performance gap between Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 is far more significant than just three percentage points. Fable 5 generates code that reads as if it were written by a senior engineer, while GPT 5.5 produces code that simply passes the tests. Both models deliver functional software, but only one delivers software that truly impresses.

    Orijinal gönderiyi gör

    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwi tarafından fotoğraf· Jun 19, 2026· GPT

    Bu fotoğraf hakkında

    The image shows a horizontal bar chart comparing AI models. The focus is on a table with model names, performance metrics, and bars representing their performance. The model "claude-fable-5" is highlighted with a red rectangle around it and its corresponding bar is orange. The table columns are labeled "MODEL", "PASS@1", "AVG COST", "OUT TOK", and "STEPS". The model names listed are claude-fable-5, gpt-5.5, claude-opus-4.8, gpt-5.4, gemini-3.5-flash, and kimi-k2.7-code. No on-screen text stands out aside from the column headers and model names.

    Tüm GPT fotoğraflarını görGPT vikisini oku

    ?

    Daha fazla GPT fotoğrafı

    Tüm GPT fotoğraflarını gör
    AI as your doctor?AI as your doctor?GPT 6 Astra effort comparison tableGPT 6 Astra effort comparison tablemanual coding psychopathmanual coding psychopathJensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 Astra2Jensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 AstraAI Breakfast greatest predictionAI Breakfast greatest predictionweekend plans cancelledweekend plans cancelledAI Image Models ComparisonAI Image Models Comparison
    Fotoğraf
    Estebankiwi
    Estebankiwi@estebankiwi3mo
    📱GPT💭AI💭Tech
    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwiClaude Fable 5 has claimed the top spot on DeepSWE with a score of 70%. However, the performance gap between Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 is far more significant than just three percentage points. Fable 5 generates code that reads as if it were written by a senior engineer, while GPT 5.5 produces code that simply passes the tests. Both models deliver functional software, but only one delivers software that truly impresses.

    Orijinal gönderiyi gör

    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwi tarafından fotoğraf· Jun 19, 2026· GPT

    Bu fotoğraf hakkında

    The image shows a horizontal bar chart comparing AI models. The focus is on a table with model names, performance metrics, and bars representing their performance. The model "claude-fable-5" is highlighted with a red rectangle around it and its corresponding bar is orange. The table columns are labeled "MODEL", "PASS@1", "AVG COST", "OUT TOK", and "STEPS". The model names listed are claude-fable-5, gpt-5.5, claude-opus-4.8, gpt-5.4, gemini-3.5-flash, and kimi-k2.7-code. No on-screen text stands out aside from the column headers and model names.

    Tüm GPT fotoğraflarını görGPT vikisini oku

    ?

    Daha fazla GPT fotoğrafı

    Tüm GPT fotoğraflarını gör
    AI as your doctor?AI as your doctor?GPT 6 Astra effort comparison tableGPT 6 Astra effort comparison tablemanual coding psychopathmanual coding psychopathJensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 Astra2Jensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 AstraAI Breakfast greatest predictionAI Breakfast greatest predictionweekend plans cancelledweekend plans cancelledAI Image Models ComparisonAI Image Models Comparison