iFANN
    iFANN'da ara...
    Giriş Yap
    Ana Sayfa
    Haberler
    Videolar
    Fotoğraflar
    GIF'ler
    Keşfet
    Anketler
    Ödüller
    iFAMOUS
    Viki
    Anime
    Odalar
    Bildirimler
    Mesajlar
    Yer İmleri
    Profil
    VikiÖdülleriFAMOUSSıralamalarSektörlerİçerik Üretici ÖdülleriKullanıcı ÖdülleriŞartlarGizlilikTopluluk KurallarıKaldırma / DMCAYardımGeliştiriciler

    © 2026 iFANN

    Ana Sayfa
    Ara
    Mesajlar
    Uyarılar
    Profil

    Gönderi

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 Beğeni0 Beğenmeme0 Yeniden paylaşım0 Yorumlar
    ?

    Yorumlar

    Henüz yorum yok. İlk yorumu sen yap!

    Gönderi

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 Beğeni0 Beğenmeme0 Yeniden paylaşım0 Yorumlar
    ?

    Yorumlar

    Henüz yorum yok. İlk yorumu sen yap!